단행본
Will this be China’s century?: a skeptic’s view
- 개인저자
- Mel Gurtov
- 발행사항
- Boulder, Colorado : Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 2013
- 형태사항
- xi, 205 p.: ill., ; 23 cm
- ISBN
- 9781588268747
- 청구기호
- 349.120422 G981w
- 서지주기
- Includes bibliographical references and index
소장정보
위치 | 등록번호 | 청구기호 / 출력 | 상태 | 반납예정일 |
---|---|---|---|---|
이용 가능 (1) | ||||
1자료실 | 00014635 | 대출가능 | - |
이용 가능 (1)
- 등록번호
- 00014635
- 상태/반납예정일
- 대출가능
- -
- 위치/청구기호(출력)
- 1자료실
책 소개
Mel Gurtov takes issue with the widespread view that China is on the way to rivalling or even displacing the United States as the dominant world power.<br><br>Gurtov identifies serious constraints that will keep the country's leadership focused for the foreseeable future on challenges at home. Arguing that China's economic rise has exacerbated problems of social inequality, environmental degradation, official corruption, and more—and that its military capabilities and ambitions are far more limited than many observers have suggested—he makes a strong case that the most productive US policy will be one of engagement on issues of common concern, rather than confrontation or containment.
Mel Gurtov takes issue with the widespread view that China is on the way to rivalling, or even displacing, the US as the dominant world power. Arguing that China's economic rise has exacerbated problems of social inequality, environmental degradation, official corruption, and more – and that its military capabilities and ambitions are far more limited than many observers have suggested – he makes a strong case that the most productive US policy will be one of engagement on issues of common concern, rather than confrontation or containment.
Mel Gurtov takes issue with the widespread view that China is on the way to rivalling, or even displacing, the US as the dominant world power. Arguing that China's economic rise has exacerbated problems of social inequality, environmental degradation, official corruption, and more – and that its military capabilities and ambitions are far more limited than many observers have suggested – he makes a strong case that the most productive US policy will be one of engagement on issues of common concern, rather than confrontation or containment.