통일연구원 전자도서관

로그인

통일연구원 전자도서관

소장자료검색

  1. 메인
  2. 소장자료검색
  3. 단행본

단행본

단행본Yale agrarian studiesThe Yale ISPS series

Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed

개인저자
James C. Scott
발행사항
New Haven : Yale University Press, 1998
형태사항
xiv, 445 p.: ill., maps ; 25 cm
ISBN
9780300078152
청구기호
321.93 S427s
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (p. 359-434) and index
소장정보
위치등록번호청구기호 / 출력상태반납예정일
이용 가능 (1)
1자료실00013785대출가능-
이용 가능 (1)
  • 등록번호
    00013785
    상태/반납예정일
    대출가능
    -
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    1자료실
책 소개
“Illuminating and beautifully written, this book calls into sharp relief the nature of the world we now inhabit.”—New Yorker
 
“A magisterial critique of top-down social planning.”—Jennifer Schuessler, New York Times
 
“One of the most profound and illuminating studies of this century to have been published in recent decades.”—John Gray, New York Times Book Review
 
Compulsory ujamaa villages in Tanzania, collectivization in Russia, Le Corbusier’s urban planning theory realized in Brasília, the Great Leap Forward in China, agricultural “modernization” in the Tropics—the twentieth century has been racked by grand utopian schemes that have inadvertently brought death and disruption to millions. Why do well-intentioned plans for improving the human condition go tragically awry?
 
In this wide-ranging and original book, James C. Scott analyzes failed cases of large-scale authoritarian plans in a variety of fields. Centrally managed social plans misfire, Scott argues, when they impose schematic visions that do violence to complex interdependencies that are not—and cannot—be fully understood. Further, the success of designs for social organization depends upon the recognition that local, practical knowledge is as important as formal, epistemic knowledge. The author builds a persuasive case against “development theory” and imperialistic state planning that disregards the values, desires, and objections of its subjects. He identifies and discusses four conditions common to all planning disasters: administrative ordering of nature and society by the state; a “high-modernist ideology” that places confidence in the ability of science to improve every aspect of human life; a willingness to use authoritarian state power to effect large- scale interventions; and a prostrate civil society that cannot effectively resist such plans.