통일연구원 전자도서관

로그인

통일연구원 전자도서관

소장자료검색

  1. 메인
  2. 소장자료검색
  3. 신착자료

신착자료

단행본

Deniable Contact: Back-Channel Negotiation in Northern Ireland

발행사항
New York : Oxford University Press, 2021
형태사항
306 p. : 25 cm
ISBN
9780192894762
청구기호
303.6 D637d
일반주기
index
소장정보
위치등록번호청구기호 / 출력상태반납예정일
이용 가능 (1)
1자료실00019033대출가능-
이용 가능 (1)
  • 등록번호
    00019033
    상태/반납예정일
    대출가능
    -
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    1자료실
책 소개
This book combines documentary evidence with original interviews with politicians, mediators, civil servants, and Republicans to create a vivid of the secret negotiations and back-channels that were used in repeated efforts to end the Northern Ireland conflict.

Deniable Contact provides the first full-length study of the secret negotiations and back-channels that were used in repeated efforts to end the Northern Ireland conflict. The analysis is founded on a rich store of historical evidence, including the private papers of key Irish Republican leaders and British politicians, recently released papers from national archives in Dublin and London, and the papers of Brendan Duddy, the intermediary who acted as the primary contact between the IRA and the British government on several occasions over a span of two decades, including papers that have not yet been made publicly available. This documentary evidence, combined with original interviews with politicians, mediators, civil servants, and Republicans, allows a vivid picture to emerge of the complex maneuvering at this intersection. Deniable Contact offers a textured account that extends our understanding of the distinctive dynamics of negotiations conducted in secret and the conditions conducive to the negotiated settlement of conflict. It disrupts and challenges some conventional notions about the conflict in Northern Ireland, offering a fresh analysis of the political dynamics and the intra-party struggles that sustained violent conflict and prevented settlement for so long. It draws on theories of negotiation and mediation to understand why efforts to end the conflict through back-channel negotiations repeatedly failed before finally succeeding in the 1990s. It challenges the view that the conflict persisted because of irreconcilable political ideologies and argues that the parties to conflict were much more open to compromise than the often-intransigent public rhetoric suggested