통일연구원 전자도서관

로그인

통일연구원 전자도서관

소장자료검색

  1. 메인
  2. 소장자료검색
  3. 특수자료

특수자료

단행본

Moscow, the fourth Rome: Stalinism, cosmopolitanism, and the evolution of Soviet culture, 1931-1941

개인저자
Katerina Clark
발행사항
Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2011
형태사항
viii, 420 p. : ill. ; 25 cm
ISBN
0674057872 9780674057876
청구기호
929.07 C592m
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (p. 353-407) and index
소장정보
위치등록번호청구기호 / 출력상태반납예정일
이용 가능 (1)
1자료실00015846대출가능-
이용 가능 (1)
  • 등록번호
    00015846
    상태/반납예정일
    대출가능
    -
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    1자료실
책 소개

In the early sixteenth century, the monk Filofei proclaimed Moscow the "Third Rome." By the 1930s, intellectuals and artists all over the world thought of Moscow as a mecca of secular enlightenment. In Moscow, the Fourth Rome, Katerina Clark shows how Soviet officials and intellectuals, in seeking to capture the imagination of leftist and anti-fascist intellectuals throughout the world, sought to establish their capital as the cosmopolitan center of a post-Christian confederation and to rebuild it to become a beacon for the rest of the world.

Clark provides an interpretative cultural history of the city during the crucial 1930s, the decade of the Great Purge. She draws on the work of intellectuals such as Sergei Eisenstein, Sergei Tretiakov, Mikhail Koltsov, and Ilya Ehrenburg to shed light on the singular Zeitgeist of that most Stalinist of periods. In her account, the decade emerges as an important moment in the prehistory of key concepts in literary and cultural studies today-transnationalism, cosmopolitanism, and world literature. By bringing to light neglected antecedents, she provides a new polemical and political context for understanding canonical works of writers such as Brecht, Benjamin, Lukacs, and Bakhtin.

Moscow, the Fourth Rome breaches the intellectual iron curtain that has circumscribed cultural histories of Stalinist Russia, by broadening the framework to include considerable interaction with Western intellectuals and trends. Its integration of the understudied international dimension into the interpretation of Soviet culture remedies misunderstandings of the world-historical significance of Moscow under Stalin.