통일연구원 전자도서관

로그인

통일연구원 전자도서관

소장자료검색

  1. 메인
  2. 소장자료검색
  3. 전체

전체

단행본

State building and late development

개인저자
David Waldner
발행사항
Ithaca, N.Y. :,Cornell University Press,,1999
형태사항
x, 246 p.: ill.; 25 cm
ISBN
9780801485756
청구기호
342 W164s
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references and index
소장정보
위치등록번호청구기호 / 출력상태반납예정일
이용 가능 (2)
1자료실00013783대출가능-
1자료실00013810대출가능-
이용 가능 (2)
  • 등록번호
    00013783
    상태/반납예정일
    대출가능
    -
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    1자료실
  • 등록번호
    00013810
    상태/반납예정일
    대출가능
    -
    위치/청구기호(출력)
    1자료실
책 소개

Why does state building sometimes promote economic growth and in other cases impede it? Through an analysis of political and economic development in four countries--Turkey, Syria, Korea, and Taiwan--this book explores the origins of political-economic institutions and the mechanisms connecting them to economic outcomes. David Waldner extends our understanding of the political underpinnings of economic development by examining the origins of political coalitions on which states and their institutions depend. He first provides a political model of institutional change to analyze how elites build either cross-class or narrow coalitions, and he examines how these arrangements shape specific institutions: state-society relations, the nature of bureaucracy, fiscal structures, and patterns of economic intervention. He then links these institutions to economic outcomes through a bargaining model to explain why countries such as Korea and Taiwan have more effectively overcome the collective dilemmas that plague economic development than have others such as Turkey and Syria. The latter countries, he shows, lack institutional solutions to the problems that surround productivity growth.

The first book to compare political and economic development in these two regions, State Building and Late Development draws on, and contributes to, arguments from political sociology and political economy. Based on a rigorous research design, the work offers both a finely drawn comparison of development and a compellingly argued analysis of the character and consequences of "precocious Keynesianism," the implementation of Keynesian demand-stimulus policies in largely pre-industrial economies.